Since today is Star Wars Day, and I friggin love Star Wars, I suppose I should say a few words about it. I'm watching A New Hope right now, and I'm thinking of what made this whole thing so popular and successful. I think I've come up with a few ideas. And while there are plenty of things about Star Wars that contribute to its awesomeness, a few main ones have a greater effect than the others. And it was by neglecting these things that George Lucas managed to make the prequels suck.
My first instinct is to credit the concept. The mythology of the Star Wars universe is original and interesting. But there are plenty of sci-fi/fantasy stories that have interesting concepts, some skillfully executed, others not so much. The weapons, scenery, characters, and other stuff are cool, but that doesn't explain the popularity the first movie managed to start. Plenty of movies could have interesting stuff, but something made people drawn to this.
Star Wars is a story about spaceships and aliens. Adventures in Space! But it doesn't throw that in your face. You see all these other movies and TV shows that are all, “LOOK! It's SCIENCE FICTIOOOOON!” They are aware of their sci-fi identity, and they stick to it. But Star Wars doesn't treat itself like a sci-fi story. Rather, it uses other genres to tell a story about things that happen to take place in space.
Think about it. Star Wars has it all. Swordfighting. Magic. Pirates. Gangsters. Aerial dogfighting. Romance. Tribes of primitive jungle natives. Gunslingers. Spies. Knights. A prophet in the wilderness. Religion. A princess in jeopardy. An evil empire fighting a rebellion. Politics. You could tag dozens of different stories in each of these genres. But Star Wars manages to put them all in the same story, and yet you don't even notice them. Other attempts to mash up different genres can easily be obvious and poorly handled. Firefly is well done, but it's a clear mix of space and western genres. In Star Wars, you don't even notice.
Another part of the whole not being too sci-fi self-aware is that it doesn't make a big deal about the sci-fi-ness. In Star Trek, they tend to be all, “Look you guys, it's a Holo-Deck! Isn't this tricorder cool? I have a laser gun!” The other shows tend to show off how cool stuff is and use the futuristic setting as a blank check to solve problems and fill plot holes. In Star Wars, they bring you into a world that still has a lot of the same problems ours does, it just happens to have different technology and stuff.
Now, the problem is that George Lucas didn't seem to have a real awareness of the secret to his own success. The prequels suck. Not because the story was bad, but because Lucas put more of a priority on the things that made other stories mediocre. They're all about “Look at this cool thing! Now look at this cool thing! It's SCIENCE FICTIOOOOON!” It was like he wanted to sell toys more than tell an interesting story. They tried to add to the mix of genres, throwing in racing, gladiators, and ground battles, but it wasn't as seamless as before. The podracing wasn't really necessary... the plot could have moved a different, more interesting way. But more merchandise could be made with podracing.
The original movies were rugged and real-feeling. That made them relatable. It was easier to feel like a part of them. The prequels were crisp and shiny, making them fun to look at, but not really deep. It's kind of like the difference between the girl who bleaches her hair, gets a boob job and wears nothing but pink, thinking that's all it takes to get a guy and the girl who actually has personality, interests, and passions. Sure, the first one might be good-looking, but you pick the second one because there is more to what a person is looking for than looks. The prequels are good for mindless entertainment, but the original movies are the kind you take home to Mom.
